SO, WITH NO INFO OR ANALYSIS SUPPLIED ABOUT EITHER POSITION,    ARE WE SUPPOSED TO ASSUME THAT -

 

- EMPLOYEES / MANAGEMENT HAVE BEEN OVERSTAFFED, DUPLICATING FUNCTIONS OR

       UNDER EMPLOYED, AND A MERGER WILL MAGICALLY PRODUCE SAVINGS BY FIXING                        THAT?

 

OR

 

- EMPLOYEES / MANAGEMENT HAVE BEEN WORKING AT CAPACITY , AND A MERGER WILL                           PRODUCE NO SAVINGS, JUST REQUIRE BUYING NEW DOOR SIGNS AND                                              STATIONERY?

 

BOTH ARE ABSURD!

 

NO CHANGE SHOULD EVEN BE CONTEMPLATED, LET ALONE RAILROADED, WITHOUT A MANAGEMENT AUDIT AND JUSTIFICATION OF THE **NEED** FOR CHANGE, AND A **PLAN** OF HOW--- AND WHY---- THAT CHANGE WILL BE IMPLEMENTED!!

 

WITHOUT a STUDY to identify the REASONS FOR, and BENEFITS FROM, any Merger of positions, the Measure C Proponents HAVE NO BUSINESS even ASKING YOU, for permission to CHANGE ANYTHING, let alone Our City Charter!

 

ON JUNE 3 VOTE --NO-- ON MEASURE "C" AND TELL THEM TO SEND THIS DEFECTIVE FALSE START BACK TO BE DONE IN 2 SEPARATE VOTES, ----WITH---- SUPPORTING PROOF OF THE NEED, AND,

IF THEN,  WITH  A PLAN ----------THE RIGHT WAY!